Everyone will tell you El Niño means less snow in the Cascades. The snow records say something more useful and more alarming: the water still arrives. In 2015-16 every Cascade station we checked measured above-normal precipitation and most still finished with less snowpack, because it fell as rain.
If you ski the Cascades, you are about to be told repeatedly that El Niño means a bad winter. That is roughly true and almost entirely unhelpful, because it describes the wrong problem.
We went into the snowpack records expecting to find a drought signal: fewer storms, less water, thinner snow. That is not what the measurements show. The water keeps arriving. In the most recent very strong El Niño, it arrived in unusual abundance. It simply stopped being snow at the elevations where most people ski.
That distinction changes what you should do about it, and it is why this page is about elevation rather than about cancelling your trip.
El Niño does not dry out the Cascades. It warms them. Expect precipitation to be normal or better and the snow line to sit higher than you want it to.
Elevation is the whole game. In the last very strong event, the one station we checked above 6,400 feet converted more of its precipitation to snow than usual. Every station below that converted less, and the lower it sat, the worse it did.
Plan for rain at the base, not for an empty mountain. The upper terrain is often fine. The bottom of the hill, where beginners and children ski, is where an El Niño winter is actually lost.
The automated snow stations across the Cascades record two things separately: how much water fell as precipitation over the season, and how much snow was sitting on the ground at the peak of the winter. Comparing the two tells you what fraction of the water stayed as snow.
That ratio is the useful number, because it separates a dry winter from a warm one. A drought shows up as low precipitation. A warm winter shows up as normal precipitation and a collapsed snow fraction.
Here is 2015-16, the most recent very strong El Niño, across the Cascades. Every figure is a percentage of that same station's own long-term normal.
| Station | Elevation | Season precipitation | Peak snowpack | Snow fraction that year | Normal snow fraction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harts Pass, WA | 6,490 ft | 115% | 125% | 1.29 | 1.21 |
| Corral Pass, WA | 5,810 ft | 123% | 93% | 0.64 | 0.88 |
| Three Creeks Meadow, OR | 5,680 ft | 113% | 90% | 0.46 | 0.58 |
| Mt Hood Test Site, OR | 5,380 ft | 117% | 83% | 0.54 | 0.81 |
| Paradise, WA | 5,150 ft | 133% | 104% | 0.63 | 0.85 |
| White Pass, WA | 4,440 ft | 141% | 119% | 0.53 | 0.67 |
| Stevens Pass, WA | 3,940 ft | 136% | 80% | 0.34 | 0.60 |
Look at the precipitation column first. Every single station had a wetter than normal season, from 113% to 141% of its own average. By any reasonable definition, 2015-16 was not a dry winter in the Cascades.
Now look at the snow fraction. Six of the seven converted less of that water into snowpack than they normally do, and Stevens Pass converted barely half its usual share: 0.34 against a normal 0.60. It received 36% more water than an average winter and finished with 20% less snow on the ground.
Water arrived. Snow did not. That is a temperature problem wearing a precipitation problem's clothes, and it is the single most important thing to understand about skiing the Northwest in an El Niño winter.
And then there is Harts Pass. At 6,490 feet, the highest station in the group, it went the other way: a slightly wet year that produced above normal snowpack and a better than normal snow fraction. High enough to stay cold, so the same warm wet pattern that ruined the low stations simply loaded it with snow.
Across the three strongest El Niño winters on record, the station at Stevens Pass averaged 78% of its normal peak snowpack, with 1982-83 the worst of them at 64%. That is the clearest negative signal we measured anywhere in North America.
But the three winters did not fail the same way, which is why the average conceals more than it reveals.
Two of the three had normal or better precipitation and below-normal snow. None of the three was a drought. If you plan for less snow you will prepare for the wrong thing. Plan for warmer.
Real talk: three winters is a small sample and we will not pretend otherwise. But the 2015-16 evidence does not rest on three: it rests on seven stations across two states all showing the same divergence in the same winter. That is a different and sturdier kind of evidence.
This is not bad luck. It follows from where the range sits and what its snow is made of.
Cascade snow is maritime. Storms come off the Pacific having travelled over relatively warm ocean, so they arrive wet and comparatively mild. The snowpack that results already sits close to its melting point through much of the winter, which is why Northwest snow has its reputation for density.
A snowpack that already lives near freezing has no margin. Add a degree or two and a meaningful share of the season's precipitation crosses from snow to rain. The same warming applied to a cold continental snowpack in Colorado or Utah, sitting well below freezing at altitude, changes far less.
The Cascades also start low. Several resorts load beginners in at elevations where the Rockies have not yet begun. That is a wonderful thing in a cold winter, because the snow comes right down to the car park. In a warm one it is exactly the exposure that hurts.
None of this says do not go. It says go with a different plan than you would in a La Niña year.
The upper mountain is usually still working. On a day when the base is in rain, the top can be in snow. That is a real difference from a season with no snow, and it means the trip is salvageable in a way a drought would not be.
But your children ski the bottom. Beginner terrain, magic carpets and ski school meeting points sit at the base, which is precisely the elevation band that loses. A family's experience of a warm Cascade storm is decided several thousand feet below where the good skiing is.
So choose on lift-served elevation, and have a wet-day plan. The Northwest has excellent rainy-day infrastructure because it has always needed it. A week with two indoor days and three good ski days is a fine holiday. A week where you booked four ski days and got rain on all of them because nobody warned you is not.
Less snow on the ground, usually yes. Less precipitation, usually no. In 2015-16 every Cascade station we checked recorded above-normal precipitation, from 113% to 141% of its average, and most still finished with below-normal snowpack. The water arrived and fell as rain at the lower elevations.
No. The upper mountain usually still works, which is very different from a drought year. What changes is how you choose and how you plan: favour higher lift-served terrain, expect rain at the base, and build indoor days into the week rather than treating them as a write-off.
For skiing at the bottom of the mountain, a warm one. Cascade snow is maritime and already sits close to melting through much of the winter, so it has little margin. A degree or two of warming moves a large share of the season's precipitation across the line from snow to rain, which is what the snow fraction figures show.
Elevation is the difference. In 2015-16 the highest station we looked at, Harts Pass at 6,490 feet, actually converted more precipitation to snow than it normally does and finished at 125% of its normal snowpack. Every station below about 6,000 feet went the other way, and the lower it sat, the worse it did.
It was, and it was almost unremarkable here: 93% of normal precipitation and 90% of normal snowpack at Stevens Pass. That is a useful reminder that these are shifted odds and not a mechanism that fires every time. One of the three strongest El Niños on record barely registered in the Cascades.
From the US Natural Resources Conservation Service's automated snow network, comparing each water year's peak snow water equivalent and its season precipitation to the median for that same station across its full record, most of them more than 40 years. Snow fraction is peak snowpack divided by season precipitation at the same site.
The El Niño picture is close to the opposite in California, and it is a non-event across most of Europe. We cover every region we serve, with the honest answers included, in our guide to El Niño and the 2026/27 ski season, and the strongest positive signal in North America is covered in El Niño and Tahoe.
Get our free family ski trip checklist and one useful email a month.
Use our tools to find the perfect family ski resort.
Forecasters give this winter a greater than 90% chance of a very strong El Niño, and a 69% chance of the strongest on record. Here is what that actually shifts, region by region, what it does not shift at all, and the one past winter that should stop anyone promising you an epic season.
Seasonal GuidesNo ski region in North America responds to El Niño like Tahoe. Palisades averaged 186% of its normal snowpack across the three strongest events and hit 256% in 1982-83. Here is what that actually means for a family week, including the two ways a huge Tahoe winter can still ruin your trip.
Seasonal GuidesThe magical European Christmas ski trip you keep imagining. Which countries do it best, where to find real Christmas markets on the mountain, and how to pull it off without losing your mind.
Transparency note: This content was created with AI assistance and reviewed by Tom Meredith, our editor. Prices, dates, and availability may change. We recommend confirming details directly with the resort before booking.